<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 777 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355356</link>
    <description>The Tribunal acknowledged the inadvertent errors made by the appellants in failing to include the money value of tool cost and free issue materials in the assessable value of parts supplied. Penalties were set aside due to the absence of clandestine activities, with the appellants promptly rectifying the duty liability upon discovery. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of including correct values in the assessable amount, even in internal transactions, while confirming the demand for differential duty, interest, and penalties. The request for leniency in penalties based on procedural misunderstanding was granted, subject to payment of interest on the confirmed duty/credit amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:32:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 777 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355356</link>
      <description>The Tribunal acknowledged the inadvertent errors made by the appellants in failing to include the money value of tool cost and free issue materials in the assessable value of parts supplied. Penalties were set aside due to the absence of clandestine activities, with the appellants promptly rectifying the duty liability upon discovery. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of including correct values in the assessable amount, even in internal transactions, while confirming the demand for differential duty, interest, and penalties. The request for leniency in penalties based on procedural misunderstanding was granted, subject to payment of interest on the confirmed duty/credit amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>