<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 23 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11870</link>
    <description>The HC affirmed the Tribunal and CIT(A), holding that an assessee who claimed and had allowed depreciation on capital assets remains entitled to exemption under section 54E of the Income-tax Act for capital gains on transfer of depreciated assets. The court ruled that prior allowance or set-off of unabsorbed depreciation does not preclude claiming the relief under section 54E or the related deduction under section 50, and directed that the exemption/deduction be allowed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 23 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11870</link>
      <description>The HC affirmed the Tribunal and CIT(A), holding that an assessee who claimed and had allowed depreciation on capital assets remains entitled to exemption under section 54E of the Income-tax Act for capital gains on transfer of depreciated assets. The court ruled that prior allowance or set-off of unabsorbed depreciation does not preclude claiming the relief under section 54E or the related deduction under section 50, and directed that the exemption/deduction be allowed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>