<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 620 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198934</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the Board meeting held on 05.02.2005 and the appointments of respondents 2 and 4 as directors. The respondents were held accountable for mismanagement and ordered to reimburse the company for stock value shortfall. The petitioner was directed to exit by selling shares to respondents at a fair value. The court restrained the sale of company properties until petitioner&#039;s exit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 18:27:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 620 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198934</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the Board meeting held on 05.02.2005 and the appointments of respondents 2 and 4 as directors. The respondents were held accountable for mismanagement and ordered to reimburse the company for stock value shortfall. The petitioner was directed to exit by selling shares to respondents at a fair value. The court restrained the sale of company properties until petitioner&#039;s exit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>