<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 975 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198932</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court quashed the resolutions of the Gram Panchayat, State Government orders, and gift deeds in favor of the respondent, a political leader. The court directed the land&#039;s possession to be returned to the Gram Panchayat for proper utilization, imposing construction costs on the respondent and additional costs of Rs. 25,000 to be paid to the amicus curiae and petitioner. No criminal prosecution orders were issued against the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:10:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 975 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198932</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court quashed the resolutions of the Gram Panchayat, State Government orders, and gift deeds in favor of the respondent, a political leader. The court directed the land&#039;s possession to be returned to the Gram Panchayat for proper utilization, imposing construction costs on the respondent and additional costs of Rs. 25,000 to be paid to the amicus curiae and petitioner. No criminal prosecution orders were issued against the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>