<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 935 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198930</link>
    <description>The Securities Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal of a registered stock broker who was suspended by the Securities and Exchange Board of India for alleged violations of regulations related to trading irregularities. The Tribunal held that the broker could not be held responsible for the actions of a sub-broker without evidence of wrongdoing by the sub-broker. As there were no specific instances of the broker failing to exercise due diligence, care, and skill, the suspension order was set aside, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:27:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 935 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198930</link>
      <description>The Securities Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal of a registered stock broker who was suspended by the Securities and Exchange Board of India for alleged violations of regulations related to trading irregularities. The Tribunal held that the broker could not be held responsible for the actions of a sub-broker without evidence of wrongdoing by the sub-broker. As there were no specific instances of the broker failing to exercise due diligence, care, and skill, the suspension order was set aside, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>