<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 29 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11868</link>
    <description>A later partnership firm was treated as a separate taxable entity because common partners, similar business and the same profit-sharing ratio did not displace its independent registration, separate books, distinct capital contributions and independent bank account, with no evidence of interlacing or diversion of funds. Assets disclosed under the Voluntary Disclosure Scheme were held to be capital assets rather than trading stock. Revaluation of those disclosed assets did not, by itself, create taxable income, because mere book enhancement is not real income; taxability would arise only on a subsequent transaction generating business profit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 29 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11868</link>
      <description>A later partnership firm was treated as a separate taxable entity because common partners, similar business and the same profit-sharing ratio did not displace its independent registration, separate books, distinct capital contributions and independent bank account, with no evidence of interlacing or diversion of funds. Assets disclosed under the Voluntary Disclosure Scheme were held to be capital assets rather than trading stock. Revaluation of those disclosed assets did not, by itself, create taxable income, because mere book enhancement is not real income; taxability would arise only on a subsequent transaction generating business profit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>