<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1330 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198914</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found a violation of natural justice in the adjudication process due to inadequate opportunities for hearings, leading to an ex parte order against the appellant. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh denovo adjudication order, ensuring the appellant&#039;s right to a fair hearing. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, leaving all issues open for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 06:22:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1330 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198914</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found a violation of natural justice in the adjudication process due to inadequate opportunities for hearings, leading to an ex parte order against the appellant. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh denovo adjudication order, ensuring the appellant&#039;s right to a fair hearing. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, leaving all issues open for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>