<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1309 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198921</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous petition seeking the recall of an order due to a communication gap, as it was filed beyond the 6-month limitation period set by an amendment in section 254(2) of the Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory limitations and highlighted that the special statute prevails over the general statute, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 06:22:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1309 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198921</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous petition seeking the recall of an order due to a communication gap, as it was filed beyond the 6-month limitation period set by an amendment in section 254(2) of the Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory limitations and highlighted that the special statute prevails over the general statute, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>