<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1169 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198922</link>
    <description>The HC held that the Tribunal erred in law by reducing the disallowance under section 14A from Rs. 2,20,15,787 to Rs. 5,47,433 relying on a precedent. The court upheld the assessee&#039;s position that disallowance under section 14A should not be included in the computation of book profit under section 115JB, affirming that section 115JB is a self-contained code and section 14A cannot be invoked for this purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1169 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198922</link>
      <description>The HC held that the Tribunal erred in law by reducing the disallowance under section 14A from Rs. 2,20,15,787 to Rs. 5,47,433 relying on a precedent. The court upheld the assessee&#039;s position that disallowance under section 14A should not be included in the computation of book profit under section 115JB, affirming that section 115JB is a self-contained code and section 14A cannot be invoked for this purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>