https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198924 The court allowed the revision, directing the alteration of Charge No. 4 from Section 8(c) read with Section 22(c) (commercial quantity) to Section 8(c) read with Section 22(b) (intermediate quantity). This decision was based on the actual content of Zolpidem in the seized tablets, which was below the commercial quantity threshold. The court emphasized that the determination of small or commercial quantity should be based on the content of the psychotropic substance in dosage form, as clarified by the Notification S.O. 2941(E)/2009 and relevant case law. en-us Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Feb 2018 06:22:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198924 The court allowed the revision, directing the alteration of Charge No. 4 from Section 8(c) read with Section 22(c) (commercial quantity) to Section 8(c) read with Section 22(b) (intermediate quantity). This decision was based on the actual content of Zolpidem in the seized tablets, which was below the commercial quantity threshold. The court emphasized that the determination of small or commercial quantity should be based on the content of the psychotropic substance in dosage form, as clarified by the Notification S.O. 2941(E)/2009 and relevant case law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198924