<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 52 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11865</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the interpretation of the Income-tax Act and Companies (Profits) Surtax Act. The court held that the scheme for reduction of share capital under the Companies Act, 1956, remained unapproved, rendering the Assessing Officer&#039;s tax assessments on sacrifices made by creditors unfounded. The court affirmed the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that the scheme had not come into force, leading to the inapplicability of tax provisions. Consequently, the court rejected the Revenue&#039;s stance and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, canceling surtax assessments for specific years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 52 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11865</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the interpretation of the Income-tax Act and Companies (Profits) Surtax Act. The court held that the scheme for reduction of share capital under the Companies Act, 1956, remained unapproved, rendering the Assessing Officer&#039;s tax assessments on sacrifices made by creditors unfounded. The court affirmed the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that the scheme had not come into force, leading to the inapplicability of tax provisions. Consequently, the court rejected the Revenue&#039;s stance and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, canceling surtax assessments for specific years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>