<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 769 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355348</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant registration under Section 12-AA to the assessee society. It held that the society&#039;s activities, including preparing and supplying mid-day meals for school children, qualified as charitable despite involving some trade elements. The court emphasized that the activities were for the advancement of general public utility and fell within the charitable scope, especially as the receipts were below the specified threshold. The court rejected the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s misinterpretation of the nature of the activities and ruled in favor of the assessee without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 15:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 769 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355348</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant registration under Section 12-AA to the assessee society. It held that the society&#039;s activities, including preparing and supplying mid-day meals for school children, qualified as charitable despite involving some trade elements. The court emphasized that the activities were for the advancement of general public utility and fell within the charitable scope, especially as the receipts were below the specified threshold. The court rejected the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s misinterpretation of the nature of the activities and ruled in favor of the assessee without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>