<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 765 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355344</link>
    <description>The High Court held that taxing the same income twice was against taxation principles. The Commissioner&#039;s dismissal of the Revision Petition for not filing a revised return was deemed unjustified. The court emphasized the broad revisional powers under section 264 of the Income Tax Act to correct errors. The court found the Commissioner&#039;s interpretation of the Act incorrect and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the double-taxed amount from the assessee&#039;s total income for the relevant year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 21:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 765 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355344</link>
      <description>The High Court held that taxing the same income twice was against taxation principles. The Commissioner&#039;s dismissal of the Revision Petition for not filing a revised return was deemed unjustified. The court emphasized the broad revisional powers under section 264 of the Income Tax Act to correct errors. The court found the Commissioner&#039;s interpretation of the Act incorrect and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the double-taxed amount from the assessee&#039;s total income for the relevant year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>