https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355334 The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the re-assessment order, citing the appellant's failure to utilize provided opportunities. The appellant's claims of lack of fair opportunity and failure to consider submitted documents were noted, with the court granting 30 days to file an appeal against the re-assessment order. A statutory deposit representing 30% of the demand under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, was required within 30 days. The court directed the appellant to comply with these conditions for the appeal process to proceed, emphasizing evaluation based on merits without influence from prior rectification rejections. en-us Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355334 The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the re-assessment order, citing the appellant's failure to utilize provided opportunities. The appellant's claims of lack of fair opportunity and failure to consider submitted documents were noted, with the court granting 30 days to file an appeal against the re-assessment order. A statutory deposit representing 30% of the demand under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, was required within 30 days. The court directed the appellant to comply with these conditions for the appeal process to proceed, emphasizing evaluation based on merits without influence from prior rectification rejections. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355334