<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 741 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355320</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263, ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that the interest income should be classified as composite income under Rule 8, connected to the agricultural operations. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of considering detailed submissions and legal precedents in such matters, ultimately quashing the revision order and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 06:17:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 741 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355320</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263, ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that the interest income should be classified as composite income under Rule 8, connected to the agricultural operations. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of considering detailed submissions and legal precedents in such matters, ultimately quashing the revision order and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>