<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 728 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355307</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, ALLAHABAD dismissed both appeals filed by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), Kanpur. The Tribunal upheld the Instructions dated 17-12-2015 by C.B.E. &amp;amp; C., setting monetary limits for filing appeals, which were increased to Rs. 10 lakhs. Citing judicial precedents from High Courts of Madras, Karnataka, and Gujarat, the Tribunal applied the litigation policy to pending appeals and found the appeals did not fall under excluded categories. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals in line with the litigation policy and emphasized the importance of adhering to regulatory monetary limits and judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 06:17:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 728 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355307</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, ALLAHABAD dismissed both appeals filed by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), Kanpur. The Tribunal upheld the Instructions dated 17-12-2015 by C.B.E. &amp;amp; C., setting monetary limits for filing appeals, which were increased to Rs. 10 lakhs. Citing judicial precedents from High Courts of Madras, Karnataka, and Gujarat, the Tribunal applied the litigation policy to pending appeals and found the appeals did not fall under excluded categories. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals in line with the litigation policy and emphasized the importance of adhering to regulatory monetary limits and judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>