<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 725 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355304</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order granting the refund of service tax paid on services used for export purposes. The Tribunal found that the appellant had provided sufficient evidence, including a certificate and a chart correlating shipping bills, to establish the nexus between the services availed and the export of goods. Despite the Revenue&#039;s lack of evidence to counter this claim, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals and disposed of cross objections accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 06:17:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 725 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355304</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order granting the refund of service tax paid on services used for export purposes. The Tribunal found that the appellant had provided sufficient evidence, including a certificate and a chart correlating shipping bills, to establish the nexus between the services availed and the export of goods. Despite the Revenue&#039;s lack of evidence to counter this claim, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals and disposed of cross objections accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>