<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 717 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355296</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Original Authority to refund the debited amount and consider interest payment, as Rule 6(3) was deemed inapplicable. The inclusion of medical examination costs in the taxable value was overturned, as it was beyond the case scope. The Tribunal upheld the modified Order-in-Appeal, emphasizing the refund directive and potential interest payment, based on a thorough review of submissions and records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 06:16:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 717 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355296</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Original Authority to refund the debited amount and consider interest payment, as Rule 6(3) was deemed inapplicable. The inclusion of medical examination costs in the taxable value was overturned, as it was beyond the case scope. The Tribunal upheld the modified Order-in-Appeal, emphasizing the refund directive and potential interest payment, based on a thorough review of submissions and records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>