<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 714 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355293</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the First Appellate Authority, allowing the claimed business expenditure of Rs. 6,50,50,000. The payments were deemed necessary to protect the business interests of the assessee and safeguard against potential losses. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the First Appellate Authority&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 06:16:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 714 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355293</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the First Appellate Authority, allowing the claimed business expenditure of Rs. 6,50,50,000. The payments were deemed necessary to protect the business interests of the assessee and safeguard against potential losses. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the First Appellate Authority&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>