<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 712 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355291</link>
    <description>A job-worker receiving imported inputs by endorsement of the bill of entry and clearing the finished excisable goods on payment of duty was treated as eligible for CENVAT credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The analysis turned on the factual position that the inputs were received in that manner and the finished goods were duty-paid on clearance, and on those facts the credit was considered admissible. No interference was found necessary with the order granting credit, and the departmental challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 06:16:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 712 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355291</link>
      <description>A job-worker receiving imported inputs by endorsement of the bill of entry and clearing the finished excisable goods on payment of duty was treated as eligible for CENVAT credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The analysis turned on the factual position that the inputs were received in that manner and the finished goods were duty-paid on clearance, and on those facts the credit was considered admissible. No interference was found necessary with the order granting credit, and the departmental challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>