<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 702 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355281</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the admissibility of Cenvat credit on Sugar Sales Commission, allowing the respondent&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal relied on precedent judgments to support the admissibility of the claimed credit, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments. Consequently, the respondent was deemed entitled to the claimed Cenvat credit, with the judgment emphasizing the entitlement to consequential relief as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 06:16:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 702 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355281</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the admissibility of Cenvat credit on Sugar Sales Commission, allowing the respondent&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal relied on precedent judgments to support the admissibility of the claimed credit, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments. Consequently, the respondent was deemed entitled to the claimed Cenvat credit, with the judgment emphasizing the entitlement to consequential relief as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>