<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 52 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11857</link>
    <description>Income from letting out a commercial complex constructed on land held under a long-term registered lease was whether assessable as &quot;Income from house property&quot; under s. 22 or &quot;Profits and gains of business&quot; under s. 28. Applying SC rulings that &quot;owner&quot; in s. 22 includes a person entitled to receive income in its own right, the HC held the assessee must be treated as owner since it built the complex and alone derived rent. The assessee&#039;s corporate object of earning income by leasing properties did not convert rental receipts into business income, as letting yields house property income unless inseparably linked to business operations. The Tribunal&#039;s order was set aside and the Revenue appeals were allowed, directing assessment under s. 22.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 52 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11857</link>
      <description>Income from letting out a commercial complex constructed on land held under a long-term registered lease was whether assessable as &quot;Income from house property&quot; under s. 22 or &quot;Profits and gains of business&quot; under s. 28. Applying SC rulings that &quot;owner&quot; in s. 22 includes a person entitled to receive income in its own right, the HC held the assessee must be treated as owner since it built the complex and alone derived rent. The assessee&#039;s corporate object of earning income by leasing properties did not convert rental receipts into business income, as letting yields house property income unless inseparably linked to business operations. The Tribunal&#039;s order was set aside and the Revenue appeals were allowed, directing assessment under s. 22.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>