https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355274 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, ALLAHABAD, set aside the demand of excise duty and penalties imposed on the appellant for the classification of sugar syrup under Tariff Item 17029090. Relying on a previous decision that the sugar syrup was not marketable and therefore not excisable, the Tribunal allowed both appeals, emphasizing the importance of proper classification of goods for excise duty purposes and the impact of past precedents on similar cases. The judgment underscores the necessity of consistency and adherence to established legal principles in excise duty matters. en-us Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Feb 2018 19:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355274 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, ALLAHABAD, set aside the demand of excise duty and penalties imposed on the appellant for the classification of sugar syrup under Tariff Item 17029090. Relying on a previous decision that the sugar syrup was not marketable and therefore not excisable, the Tribunal allowed both appeals, emphasizing the importance of proper classification of goods for excise duty purposes and the impact of past precedents on similar cases. The judgment underscores the necessity of consistency and adherence to established legal principles in excise duty matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355274