<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 694 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355273</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal partly for statistical purposes. The AO was directed to verify if the payees had paid taxes, and if confirmed, no disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) should be made. Additionally, the disallowance under Section 36(1)(va) was deleted as the employee contributions were deposited before the due date for filing the return. The order was pronounced on 29/11/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 06:15:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 694 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355273</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal partly for statistical purposes. The AO was directed to verify if the payees had paid taxes, and if confirmed, no disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) should be made. Additionally, the disallowance under Section 36(1)(va) was deleted as the employee contributions were deposited before the due date for filing the return. The order was pronounced on 29/11/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>