<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 690 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355269</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal dated 14/08/2015, allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal. It was held that the Show Cause Notice alleging availing Cenvat credit without receiving goods was not sustainable, as it was not definitively proven that the appellant did not receive the inputs. The appellant was entitled to consequential relief as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 06:15:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 690 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355269</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal dated 14/08/2015, allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal. It was held that the Show Cause Notice alleging availing Cenvat credit without receiving goods was not sustainable, as it was not definitively proven that the appellant did not receive the inputs. The appellant was entitled to consequential relief as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>