https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198908 The Board directed the respondent-companies to convene an EOGM to rectify the appointments and resolutions passed in the 1998 AGMs. It declined to consider the petitioners' request for asset division due to the pending civil suit and complex shareholding patterns but allowed the petitioners to approach the Board if the High Court grants the declaration of equal shareholding and joint management. The petitions were disposed of without any order as to cost. en-us Fri, 30 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:19:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198908 The Board directed the respondent-companies to convene an EOGM to rectify the appointments and resolutions passed in the 1998 AGMs. It declined to consider the petitioners' request for asset division due to the pending civil suit and complex shareholding patterns but allowed the petitioners to approach the Board if the High Court grants the declaration of equal shareholding and joint management. The petitions were disposed of without any order as to cost. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 30 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198908