https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198906 An appeal does not lie against a mere notice, so the challenge was held not maintainable. Given the delay in passing a fresh order after remand, the Tribunal used its procedural powers to protect the appellant from further hardship and directed appearance before the adjudicating authority. The authority was required to hear the appellant, consider the evidence and submissions, and pass a reasoned and speaking order within the stipulated time. The appellant may seek further remedy only after the fresh adjudication, if permissible in law. en-us Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Mar 2019 14:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198906 An appeal does not lie against a mere notice, so the challenge was held not maintainable. Given the delay in passing a fresh order after remand, the Tribunal used its procedural powers to protect the appellant from further hardship and directed appearance before the adjudicating authority. The authority was required to hear the appellant, consider the evidence and submissions, and pass a reasoned and speaking order within the stipulated time. The appellant may seek further remedy only after the fresh adjudication, if permissible in law. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198906