<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1533 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198907</link>
    <description>Related-party import valuation under the Customs Valuation Rules was discussed in the context of enhancement of assessable value on the basis of available material. The authority relied on the importer&#039;s failure to cooperate, produce documents on the joint venture arrangement, or place evidence to rebut the valuation findings, after issuing a questionnaire and granting hearing. On that record, the enhancement was sustained because the material before the authority was not displaced. The complaint of denial of natural justice was rejected because the proceedings showed opportunity to respond and no demonstrable prejudice was established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:16:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1533 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198907</link>
      <description>Related-party import valuation under the Customs Valuation Rules was discussed in the context of enhancement of assessable value on the basis of available material. The authority relied on the importer&#039;s failure to cooperate, produce documents on the joint venture arrangement, or place evidence to rebut the valuation findings, after issuing a questionnaire and granting hearing. On that record, the enhancement was sustained because the material before the authority was not displaced. The complaint of denial of natural justice was rejected because the proceedings showed opportunity to respond and no demonstrable prejudice was established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>