https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198905 Appellate interference with an industrial award is unwarranted where the result is substantially just and refusal to intervene represents a reasonable exercise of discretion. Extension of a benefit received by branch workers to head office workmen did not cause a failure of justice; whether the payment was bonus or ex gratia was immaterial. Uniform treatment to preserve industrial peace, coupled with the comparatively small cost of the extension, supported leaving the award undisturbed. The challenge failed because no case for interference was established. en-us Fri, 23 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:03:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198905 Appellate interference with an industrial award is unwarranted where the result is substantially just and refusal to intervene represents a reasonable exercise of discretion. Extension of a benefit received by branch workers to head office workmen did not cause a failure of justice; whether the payment was bonus or ex gratia was immaterial. Uniform treatment to preserve industrial peace, coupled with the comparatively small cost of the extension, supported leaving the award undisturbed. The challenge failed because no case for interference was established. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198905