<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (1) TMI 80 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198904</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the lower appellate court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and ruling that the sale of securities without proper notice was invalid and unenforceable against the respondent. Emphasizing the necessity of providing clear notice before selling pledged securities as mandated by Section 176 of the Contract Act, the court found the sale unlawful due to lack of proper notification to the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:56:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (1) TMI 80 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198904</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the lower appellate court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and ruling that the sale of securities without proper notice was invalid and unenforceable against the respondent. Emphasizing the necessity of providing clear notice before selling pledged securities as mandated by Section 176 of the Contract Act, the court found the sale unlawful due to lack of proper notification to the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>