<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1289 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198899</link>
    <description>The Calcutta High Court dismissed the application for default because no one appeared for the appellant/applicant and no accommodation was sought on the hearing date. The record also notes prior non-representation on the previous occasion, and the dismissal was made on that procedural ground without any adjudication on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:49:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1289 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198899</link>
      <description>The Calcutta High Court dismissed the application for default because no one appeared for the appellant/applicant and no accommodation was sought on the hearing date. The record also notes prior non-representation on the previous occasion, and the dismissal was made on that procedural ground without any adjudication on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>