https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198898 Order XIV Rule 2 CPC requires judgment on all issues, and permits a jurisdictional question or statutory bar to be tried first only at the court's discretion. A trial court is therefore not bound to treat issues on the bar of suit under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, the Collector's authority to institute the suit, or court fee as preliminary issues merely because they raise jurisdictional or statutory-bar questions. The court may refuse piecemeal trial where it is not plainly appropriate, and such refusal is not illegal on that ground alone. The writ petition was dismissed because the orders declining preliminary adjudication disclosed no manifest illegality. en-us Wed, 19 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:47:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198898 Order XIV Rule 2 CPC requires judgment on all issues, and permits a jurisdictional question or statutory bar to be tried first only at the court's discretion. A trial court is therefore not bound to treat issues on the bar of suit under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, the Collector's authority to institute the suit, or court fee as preliminary issues merely because they raise jurisdictional or statutory-bar questions. The court may refuse piecemeal trial where it is not plainly appropriate, and such refusal is not illegal on that ground alone. The writ petition was dismissed because the orders declining preliminary adjudication disclosed no manifest illegality. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198898