https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198897 Order XIV Rule 2 requires courts to decide all issues together, subject to a limited discretion to try a jurisdictional or statutory bar issue first. The refusal to treat a Section 66(1) objection as a preliminary issue was not a jurisdictional error because the rule does not make separate trial mandatory in every case. Where the trial court considers it more expedient to decide the bar question with the other issues, especially when substantially the same facts arise on both sides, no revisional interference is warranted. The trial court's choice to avoid splitting the trial was therefore upheld. en-us Tue, 01 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:43:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198897 Order XIV Rule 2 requires courts to decide all issues together, subject to a limited discretion to try a jurisdictional or statutory bar issue first. The refusal to treat a Section 66(1) objection as a preliminary issue was not a jurisdictional error because the rule does not make separate trial mandatory in every case. Where the trial court considers it more expedient to decide the bar question with the other issues, especially when substantially the same facts arise on both sides, no revisional interference is warranted. The trial court's choice to avoid splitting the trial was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198897