<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 732 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198893</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision that time was not the essence of the contract and that the respondent demonstrated readiness and willingness to perform his obligations. The Court ordered the respondent to deposit Rs. 75,000 within eight weeks from a specified date, allowing the appellants to withdraw the amount with interest if deposited. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:15:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 732 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198893</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision that time was not the essence of the contract and that the respondent demonstrated readiness and willingness to perform his obligations. The Court ordered the respondent to deposit Rs. 75,000 within eight weeks from a specified date, allowing the appellants to withdraw the amount with interest if deposited. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>