<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 961 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198889</link>
    <description>Criminal proceedings under Sections 406, 498A and 114 IPC may be quashed where the complaint contains only vague and general allegations without specific particulars of each accused&#039;s role. The complaint here omitted the dates, exact entrustment, description or weight of the alleged ornaments, and the specific acts attributed to the appellants; the accusations were largely directed at the deceased husband and the allegations against the aged parents were generalized. The Court held that mere reproduction of statutory language is insufficient and that the complaint must disclose the individual offence and role of each accused. Continuation of the prosecution was held to be an abuse of process, and the complaint and cognizance order were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:00:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 961 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198889</link>
      <description>Criminal proceedings under Sections 406, 498A and 114 IPC may be quashed where the complaint contains only vague and general allegations without specific particulars of each accused&#039;s role. The complaint here omitted the dates, exact entrustment, description or weight of the alleged ornaments, and the specific acts attributed to the appellants; the accusations were largely directed at the deceased husband and the allegations against the aged parents were generalized. The Court held that mere reproduction of statutory language is insufficient and that the complaint must disclose the individual offence and role of each accused. Continuation of the prosecution was held to be an abuse of process, and the complaint and cognizance order were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>