<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 949 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198886</link>
    <description>The petitioner challenged re-assessment orders and demand notices for the tax period. The appellate authority granted stay for 50% of disputed taxes pending appeal but failed to dispose of the case within 120 days. The court directed the respondent to refrain from recovering the balance until the appeal was decided and instructed timely adjudication. The writ petitions were disposed of accordingly, with the HCGP allowed to file appearance without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:40:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 949 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198886</link>
      <description>The petitioner challenged re-assessment orders and demand notices for the tax period. The appellate authority granted stay for 50% of disputed taxes pending appeal but failed to dispose of the case within 120 days. The court directed the respondent to refrain from recovering the balance until the appeal was decided and instructed timely adjudication. The writ petitions were disposed of accordingly, with the HCGP allowed to file appearance without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>