https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198882 Dismissal of an earlier appeal on limitation, without any adjudication on merits, did not create merger of the Registrar's order and did not bar cross-objections under Order 41 Rule 22 CPC. The respondent's cross-objections therefore remained maintainable and could be pursued when the main appeal was heard. The trade mark dispute was also remitted for de novo consideration because the party had not received a full to adduce evidence on the genuineness of the document, proprietorship, user, and the public policy objection. Fresh decision was directed on the whole evidence before the Registrar. en-us Mon, 13 Aug 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Apr 2023 14:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198882 Dismissal of an earlier appeal on limitation, without any adjudication on merits, did not create merger of the Registrar's order and did not bar cross-objections under Order 41 Rule 22 CPC. The respondent's cross-objections therefore remained maintainable and could be pursued when the main appeal was heard. The trade mark dispute was also remitted for de novo consideration because the party had not received a full to adduce evidence on the genuineness of the document, proprietorship, user, and the public policy objection. Fresh decision was directed on the whole evidence before the Registrar. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 13 Aug 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198882