https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198881 The appellant's suit for recovery was dismissed by the trial court due to lack of authorization of the person filing the suit, specifically regarding the execution and authentication of a power of attorney. The court emphasized the necessity of proving due execution of the power of attorney and resolution of the Board of Directors. Despite arguments under Section 85 of the Evidence Act and comparisons with previous judgments, the lack of evidence showing proper execution led to the appeal's dismissal, as the court found no grounds for remand based on established case law and procedural requirements. en-us Tue, 03 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Feb 2018 12:22:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198881 The appellant's suit for recovery was dismissed by the trial court due to lack of authorization of the person filing the suit, specifically regarding the execution and authentication of a power of attorney. The court emphasized the necessity of proving due execution of the power of attorney and resolution of the Board of Directors. Despite arguments under Section 85 of the Evidence Act and comparisons with previous judgments, the lack of evidence showing proper execution led to the appeal's dismissal, as the court found no grounds for remand based on established case law and procedural requirements. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198881