<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 669 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355248</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed on the assessee under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal found the show cause notice under Section 274 to be defective as it lacked specificity regarding the charges against the assessee. Citing precedents emphasizing the need for clear charges in penalty proceedings, the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 07:32:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 669 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355248</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed on the assessee under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal found the show cause notice under Section 274 to be defective as it lacked specificity regarding the charges against the assessee. Citing precedents emphasizing the need for clear charges in penalty proceedings, the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>