https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355241 Imported run-flat tyres bearing the RF marking were disputed only because the prescribed symbol under the Board's Instruction dated 30.01.2012 had not been affixed before clearance. The instruction was treated as requiring the symbol before release, but the importer expressed willingness to comply by affixing it. On that basis, the absence of the symbol was not considered sufficient for absolute confiscation once pre-clearance compliance was undertaken, and the matter was sent back for reconsideration of release in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 18:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355241 Imported run-flat tyres bearing the RF marking were disputed only because the prescribed symbol under the Board's Instruction dated 30.01.2012 had not been affixed before clearance. The instruction was treated as requiring the symbol before release, but the importer expressed willingness to comply by affixing it. On that basis, the absence of the symbol was not considered sufficient for absolute confiscation once pre-clearance compliance was undertaken, and the matter was sent back for reconsideration of release in accordance with law. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355241