<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 660 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355239</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous applications filed by the adjudicating authority, finding them procedurally inappropriate and lacking merit. The main appeal was scheduled to continue on 15th February 2018, and the adjudicating authority, Shri KVS Singh, was directed to appear before the Bench to explain his actions and provide any mitigating statements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 660 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355239</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous applications filed by the adjudicating authority, finding them procedurally inappropriate and lacking merit. The main appeal was scheduled to continue on 15th February 2018, and the adjudicating authority, Shri KVS Singh, was directed to appear before the Bench to explain his actions and provide any mitigating statements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>