<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 653 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355232</link>
    <description>The case involved ineligible duty drawback claims, confiscation of exported goods, and imposition of penalties. The applicant admitted to claiming higher rates of drawback, paid back the ineligible amount, and rectified the error. The Bench found the applicant cooperative and settled the duty drawback liability at Rs. 20,01,721/- and interest at Rs. 3,66,965/-, already paid by the applicant. No fine or penalty was imposed due to the inadvertent nature of the mistake and proactive rectification measures taken by the applicant. The immunity granted is subject to withdrawal for withholding material particulars or providing false evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 07:19:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 653 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355232</link>
      <description>The case involved ineligible duty drawback claims, confiscation of exported goods, and imposition of penalties. The applicant admitted to claiming higher rates of drawback, paid back the ineligible amount, and rectified the error. The Bench found the applicant cooperative and settled the duty drawback liability at Rs. 20,01,721/- and interest at Rs. 3,66,965/-, already paid by the applicant. No fine or penalty was imposed due to the inadvertent nature of the mistake and proactive rectification measures taken by the applicant. The immunity granted is subject to withdrawal for withholding material particulars or providing false evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>