<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 644 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355223</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the restoration application due to valid reasons for non-appearance, including the unexpected events of a partner&#039;s death and an advocate&#039;s retirement. The appellant&#039;s appeal, initially disposed of ex parte, was reinstated for a final hearing without adjournment. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of parties staying informed and taking timely action in legal proceedings to prevent adverse outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 07:18:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 644 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355223</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the restoration application due to valid reasons for non-appearance, including the unexpected events of a partner&#039;s death and an advocate&#039;s retirement. The appellant&#039;s appeal, initially disposed of ex parte, was reinstated for a final hearing without adjournment. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of parties staying informed and taking timely action in legal proceedings to prevent adverse outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>