<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 637 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355216</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant. It held that transportation and commissioning costs should not be included in the total price for calculating Central Excise duty under Rule 6(3)(b) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The decision aligned with previous case law, emphasizing that such costs are not includible for Central Excise duty purposes. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of maintaining separate accounts for dutiable and exempted final products to ensure accurate calculations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 07:17:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 637 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355216</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant. It held that transportation and commissioning costs should not be included in the total price for calculating Central Excise duty under Rule 6(3)(b) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The decision aligned with previous case law, emphasizing that such costs are not includible for Central Excise duty purposes. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of maintaining separate accounts for dutiable and exempted final products to ensure accurate calculations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>