<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 634 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355213</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the impugned order by canceling the penalty while upholding the remaining parts of the order. The appeal was partly allowed based on the duty payment timeline and relevant legal precedents, emphasizing the importance of duty payment before the issuance of a show cause notice in determining penalty applicability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 07:17:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 634 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355213</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the impugned order by canceling the penalty while upholding the remaining parts of the order. The appeal was partly allowed based on the duty payment timeline and relevant legal precedents, emphasizing the importance of duty payment before the issuance of a show cause notice in determining penalty applicability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>