<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 633 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355212</link>
    <description>Related-person valuation under the Central Excise valuation rules was held applicable only where the assessee clears its entire production through the related person. Because the assessee supplied goods both to PALI and to ELMI, the Tribunal found that the case did not involve 100% clearances to the alleged related person. The department&#039;s valuation basis for ELMI was therefore unsustainable, and the demand based on that premise was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 07:17:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 633 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355212</link>
      <description>Related-person valuation under the Central Excise valuation rules was held applicable only where the assessee clears its entire production through the related person. Because the assessee supplied goods both to PALI and to ELMI, the Tribunal found that the case did not involve 100% clearances to the alleged related person. The department&#039;s valuation basis for ELMI was therefore unsustainable, and the demand based on that premise was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>