https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355212 The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the appeal filed by the department was dismissed. The Tribunal found that the Valuation Rules did not apply as the appellant did not supply 100% of the goods to the related party, leading to the charge of undervaluation being deemed unsustainable. Consequently, the order concerning the demand from the specific period related to that party was set aside. en-us Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Feb 2018 07:17:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355212 The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the appeal filed by the department was dismissed. The Tribunal found that the Valuation Rules did not apply as the appellant did not supply 100% of the goods to the related party, leading to the charge of undervaluation being deemed unsustainable. Consequently, the order concerning the demand from the specific period related to that party was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355212