<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 632 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355211</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for compensation received for supplying inferior ink, agreeing that it constituted regular income to be added to the value of goods manufactured. However, the demand for most miscellaneous income components, considered adhoc, was dismissed. The Tribunal found the impugned order reasonable and dismissed both appeals, clarifying the treatment of different types of income in manufacturing activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 632 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355211</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for compensation received for supplying inferior ink, agreeing that it constituted regular income to be added to the value of goods manufactured. However, the demand for most miscellaneous income components, considered adhoc, was dismissed. The Tribunal found the impugned order reasonable and dismissed both appeals, clarifying the treatment of different types of income in manufacturing activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>