<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 610 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355189</link>
    <description>Penalty for delayed deposit of admitted tax under the U.P. VAT Act was held unsustainable where the assessee showed reasonable cause. The delay was only two days, the assessee had no liquid funds, the explanation had already been accepted by the assessing authority for extension of time, and the tax was later deposited with interest. The Court held that penalty under a provision requiring failure to pay tax &quot;without reasonable cause&quot; is not automatic, and the existence of overdraft facilities does not by itself defeat a bona fide explanation because such facilities are not equivalent to available liquid funds. The revision was allowed and the penalty order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 07:16:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 610 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355189</link>
      <description>Penalty for delayed deposit of admitted tax under the U.P. VAT Act was held unsustainable where the assessee showed reasonable cause. The delay was only two days, the assessee had no liquid funds, the explanation had already been accepted by the assessing authority for extension of time, and the tax was later deposited with interest. The Court held that penalty under a provision requiring failure to pay tax &quot;without reasonable cause&quot; is not automatic, and the existence of overdraft facilities does not by itself defeat a bona fide explanation because such facilities are not equivalent to available liquid funds. The revision was allowed and the penalty order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>