<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1304 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198870</link>
    <description>The Settlement Commission, after investigating the dual benefit availed by the applicant under two schemes, settled the case under Section 127C(5) of the Customs Act, 1962. The settlement required payment of customs duty, interest, penalty, and allowed redemption of seized goods upon payment of a fine. Immunity from prosecution was granted with specific conditions. The order outlined consequences for non-compliance and non-payment within the specified time. The applicant was advised on order implementation, and a copy was provided to the jurisdictional Commissioner for enforcement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2018 20:22:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1304 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198870</link>
      <description>The Settlement Commission, after investigating the dual benefit availed by the applicant under two schemes, settled the case under Section 127C(5) of the Customs Act, 1962. The settlement required payment of customs duty, interest, penalty, and allowed redemption of seized goods upon payment of a fine. Immunity from prosecution was granted with specific conditions. The order outlined consequences for non-compliance and non-payment within the specified time. The applicant was advised on order implementation, and a copy was provided to the jurisdictional Commissioner for enforcement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>