<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1531 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198876</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with remands for fresh examination on specific issues. The Tribunal emphasized the need for detailed verification by the AO in certain cases and upheld the disallowances where procedural lapses were evident. The judgment highlights the importance of adhering to statutory requirements and providing compelling evidence for exceptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1531 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198876</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with remands for fresh examination on specific issues. The Tribunal emphasized the need for detailed verification by the AO in certain cases and upheld the disallowances where procedural lapses were evident. The judgment highlights the importance of adhering to statutory requirements and providing compelling evidence for exceptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>